Take charge of your investments through research that shows its work.

Institutional-grade analysis in plain language. Dawo runs the valuation, checks the accounting, and stress-tests the downside, then answers the questions you actually have — every verdict traceable to SEC filings and market data. Research for your decisions, not stock tips.

See it live — no signupor create a free account →

Free during beta · then Pro $19/mo, free tier stays · Read-only broker access · Not financial advice

Acme Industries
ACME
$0.00
Undervalued
Conviction
0
High

Illustrative example. Probability-weighted expected price implies meaningful upside vs current. Capex backlog underpins multi-year demand visibility; clean forensics (Piotroski 8/9) and accelerating margins support the thesis. Key risk: customer concentration in top-4 buyers.

Revenue trend
Accelerating
Profitability
Expanding
Balance sheet
Fortress
Guidance
Beat & raised
Momentum
Positive
✓ Beneish: Pass✓ Piotroski: 8/9
Fwd P/E
32.1x
EV/EBITDA
28.4x
FCF Yield
2.6%
Div Yield
0.04%
Bear
$0
Base
$0
Bull
$0

Every verdict leads with the call and the conviction. The evidence is one click away.

How it works

1
Start with a ticker or your portfolio
Research any stock by symbol, or connect your brokerage (read-only) or upload a CSV to bring in everything you own.
2
Dawo runs its research pipeline
Live filings and market data feed a valuation, peer comps, forensic accounting checks, and a scenario stress test — plus a portfolio-level risk scan.
3
You get a verdict you can interrogate
A clear call with a conviction score, the conditions that would flip it, and a source for every number. Follow up in plain English.

What actually happens behind a verdict

Most AI gives you a paragraph. Dawo gives you a research file — every step visible, every term in plain English.

The verdict + convictionA clear call — Undervalued, Fairly valued, or Overvalued — and how strongly the evidence backs it.
Bear · Base · BullThe price under a pessimistic, expected, and optimistic case. 'Now' is today's price; change an assumption and it recomputes.
Piotroski 8/9Accounting-quality score; 9 is pristine.
Beneish: PassScreens for signs of earnings manipulation.
Altman Z: SafeBankruptcy-risk score; higher is safer.
Valuation, cross-checkedFwd P/E, EV/EBITDA, FCF yield — never read alone, always against peers and analyst consensus.

Every figure traces to a dated SEC filing or market feed. Nothing here is a guess dressed up as a fact.

Not sure what to research? Screen in plain English.

Describe what you're looking for; Dawo maps it to factor scores, valuation, and consensus — and every match is one click from a full research view.

GARP: EPS growth ≥ 15%, PEG < 1.5, mkt cap > $5Blarge-cap quality value, P/E under 18dividend stocks with yield above 3%high-growth tech, EPS growth ≥ 20%

Already invested? See your portfolio the way a risk desk would.

Connect your brokerage read-only, or upload a CSV. Dawo merges every account into one view, scores six health dimensions, and stress-tests it against real market scenarios.

Concentration
HHI 1,847
Caution
Top holding is 22% — how lopsided your bets are
Sector coverage
8 / 11 sectors
Caution
Missing energy, utilities, materials
Valuation
P/E 24.3
Good
In line with the S&P 500
Beta
1.12x
Good
Moves a bit more than the market
Quality
ROE 28.4%
Good
Well above the 15% bar
Risk
VaR 2.8%
Good
Your typical worst day, 95% of the time
ScenarioImpactDollar lossvs S&P
Market crash-26.4%-$13,200Better
Tech crash-31.2%-$15,600Worse
Rate spike-8.1%-$4,050Better
Recession-18.7%-$9,350Similar

Illustrative $50k portfolio. Your analysis runs on your actual holdings with live data.

Ask in plain English. Get a plan, the work, and a conclusion.

Complex questions get a visible plan, step-by-step execution against live data, and a structured answer with next steps. Either way, every number comes from a real tool run you can open — not a plausible-sounding paragraph.

My portfolio feels too concentrated. Walk me through the risk and suggest how to spread it out.
Plan · 4 of 4 done
  • ✓ Mapped concentration — single-stock + sector
  • ✓ Pulled factor tilts — growth, value, quality
  • ✓ Stress-tested the top risks — 2008, COVID, rate shock
  • ✓ Found the gaps → screened quality candidates to fill them
Bottom line: Your portfolio is essentially one bet — large-cap tech. Your top holding is ~34%, about 7× a typical single-name weight, so a tech drawdown would hit you roughly twice as hard as the S&P.
Worth considering: trimming the top name toward ~15%, and adding sectors you don't hold (healthcare, staples) to cut single-sector risk. Here's the math behind each →
Watch next: next tech earnings (mid-July) · CPI release3 sources
Show the rebalance mathCompare my top holding to its closest peersWhat if rates spike instead?Deep-dive my top holding

Suggestions are research, not personalized advice. You decide what to do.

Why trust a verdict from Dawo?

We keep score — out loud.

Dawo records every verdict and measures it against what the stock actually did at 3, 6, and 12 months, using thresholds we publish. We're in beta, so the track record is still building — but the methodology is public and the live numbers are one click away. A general chatbot can't show you this, because it never kept score.

See our methodology →
Every claim is sourced.Filings, analyst consensus, earnings calls, and forensic signals sit next to the verdict — each dated and traceable.
Read-only by design.Connect your broker to analyze it. Dawo can see balances and positions — it can never place a trade or move money.
Never used to train AI.Your portfolio is used only to produce your analysis — we require the same of every model provider, including Anthropic's Claude. No ads, no data sales.

Isn't this just ChatGPT for stocks?

No. A general model summarizes what it read. Dawo runs the analysis.

A general chatbot
Answers from training data
A plausible paragraph
No accounting checks
Can't tell you if it was right
You can't open the math
Dawo
Pulls live SEC filings and market data on every run
A verdict, a conviction level, and a fair-value range
Beneish, Piotroski, Altman run every time
Scores every call against the outcome — methodology public
Every number traces to a dated source

The difference between a friend who reads the news and an analyst who runs the numbers.

Frequently asked questions

See what your portfolio looks like under the hood.

No signup, no credit card — the demo loads a sample portfolio you can poke at.

See it live — no signupCreate a free account →